(108)
SODRAC’s framing of the issue is not entirely
wrong: the Board does have the power under s. 70.2 to “fix the royalties and
their related terms and conditions”. That is, the Board may decide upon a fair royalty to be paid
should the user decide to engage in the activity at issue under the terms of a
licence. However, this power does not contain within it the power to force
these terms on a user who, having reviewed the terms, decided that engaging in
licensed copying is not the way to proceed. Of course, should the user then
engage in unauthorized copying regardless, it will remain liable for
infringement. But it will not be liable as a licensee unless it affirmatively
assumes the benefits and burdens of the licence....
(113) I find that licences fixed by the Board do not have mandatory binding force
over a user; the Board has the statutory authority to fix the terms of licences
pursuant to s. 70.2, but a user retains the ability to decide whether to become
a licensee and operate pursuant to that licence, or to decline.
And by a remarkable coincidence that could only happen in Ottawa, I attended an event tonight in the lobby of the Supreme Court of Canada hosted by the Bora Laskin Society at which we heard inspiring, wise and witty stories from Justice Michael Moldaver with moderator Professor Adam Dodek.
And, with the kind and patient tutelage of none other than Justice Russell Brown, the recently appointed Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada who fills the vacancy left by Justice Marshall Rothstein who retired this summer, I finally learned how to do a selfie. And here's that selfie:
HPK
No comments:
Post a Comment