Monday, December 05, 2011
December 6, 2011
Intellectual Property Watch
By Howard Knopf
A “clatch” is another word for “brood”, which is a not inappropriate word in the present circumstances – considering that Canada’s highest court will hear five (yes, five!) cases on December 6 and 7, 2011 that all emanate from Canada’s Copyright Board. These cases are on appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal, arising in turn from “judicial review” of five recent decisions from the Copyright Board. Judicial review, in this context, is essentially the same thing as an “appeal”.
The whole article is available here without a pay wall at the esteemed Geneva-based IP-Watch website, to which I am pleased to occasionally contribute and to which readers around the world should subscribe because it is indispensable in terms of major policy developments, particularly at WIPO and in other major fora and important courts...
Friday, November 25, 2011
Here (in blue/grey) are the interveners’ factums (briefs) in the Supreme Court of Canada fair dealing cases, which will be heard with three other cases arising from the Copyright Board on December 6 and 7, 2011. These intervener factums are not available on the SCC website. The parties’ factums are available at the Court’s site via the green hyperlinks below.
Province of Alberta et al v. Access Copyright(the K-12 “education” case) SCC #33,888
Canadian Authors Association, Canadian Freelance Union, Canadian Society of Children's Authors,Illustrators and Performers, League of Canadian Poets, Literary Translators' Association of Canada, Playwrights Guild of Canada
Canadian Publishers' Council, Association of Canadian Publishers, and Canadian Educational Resources Council
(Disclosure: I am counsel for the Centre for Innovation Law and Policy of the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto)
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
November 28, 2011
Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
2600–160 Elgin Street
While governments make laws, it is the responsibility and duty of the judges in our courts to interpret and apply those laws. Judges are given a unique degree of independence and security of tenure in Canadian society in order to be able to properly carry out their duties impartially and free of extraneous influence. It is a fundamental tenet of our judicial system that “Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done.”
In Canada, the accepted convention is that judges speak on matters of public policy only through their judgments and only to the extent necessary to render the necessary decision. They rarely speak or write “out of court” in a public forum, and when they do so, it is invariably in a measured manner and usually on issues such as the administration of justice that are of concern primarily to law students, the legal profession or to other judges. By contrast, English, and particularly American, judges are in some cases much more outspoken outside of the courtroom on a wide range of issues.
That said, judges in Canada are amongst the most well-informed and articulate participants in our system of governance. Would Canadian society as a whole, taking into account the justice system, benefit from more outspoken “out of court” discourse by the judiciary? Does the retirement of a judge make a difference in this discussion?
Couchiching Ottawa is honoured to launch its first informal evening for 2011–12 with the Honourable John D. Richard, who recently retired as Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal. Justice Richard presided over this Court and its predecessor for the decade between 1999 and 2009. This was a momentous period in Canadian legal and political history and the establishment of the Federal Court of Appeal itself as a keystone institution in Canadian public law. Prior to his appointment to the bench in 1994, he had a long and very successful career as a lawyer, appearing in many and varied cases of great importance.
In the Couchiching tradition, our guests and participants are invited to speak openly and frankly, and to engage in non-partisan, provocative and free debate. Accordingly, this evening will be conducted off the record under the Chatham House Rule. Attendance is limited and we welcome your participation.
|The Couchiching Institute is grateful to Earnscliffe Strategy Group and Gowlings for their sponsorship of the Ottawa Round Tables.
$35 + HST, $20 + HST for students.REGISTRATION
Wine and hors d’œuvres will be served.
Space is limited, so book now! Prepayment required.PREVIOUS ROUND TABLES
Register by calling 416-642-6374 , 866-647-6374 . Registration is limited and will be conducted on a first-come, first-served basis. For more information, you can also e-mail email@example.com,
- The Responsibility to Protect: The Road to Libya and Beyond, with Prof. Errol Mendes, University of Ottawa, and Fergus Watt, Federalist Movement of Canada, May 30, 2011 (originally planned with General Roméo Dallaire who was unable to attend because of illness)
- Demonstrations and Civil Society: From Toronto to Tunisia to Egypt — And Beyond? with Nathalie Des Rosiers, February 28, 2011
- “Yes, Minister” or “No, Minister”? with Dr. Alex Himelfarb and Dr. Munir Sheikh, November 1, 2010
- Roundtable Summary of “The Future of Public Broadcasting in Canada,” March 30, 2009 (pdf)
- Roundtable Summary of “Canada’s International Development Strategy
in a Conservative Era: Staying the Course or Charting a New Path?”,
November 20, 2008
- Reasonable Accommodation in Canada, April 24, 2008, Gowlings Ottawa (pdf)
If you're not on our mailing list already, get on it! Call us at 416-642-6374 , 866-647-6374 , or email firstname.lastname@example.org. We promise never to give your address out to anyone nor will we send you mailings unrelated to the Couchiching Institute on Public Affairs.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Costco has won a
victory notable battle in its long war with Omega over the parallel importation of Omega watches, which Costco sold at about a 40% discount.
A U.S. district court judge has ruled that Omega's use of a copyrighted stamped design on the back of the watch - one purpose of which Omega conceded was to control importation - constituted copyright misuse.
Here's the summary judgment ruling,
Canadian IP, trade and competition lawyers will recall that the Supreme Court of Canada opened the door to a similar conclusion someday in the Kraft v. Euro Excellence case, in which I acted for the Retail Council of Canada. Look at the reasons from Justice Bastarache and Justice Fish on misuse and trade control respectively.
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
There 's a really big battle brewing in Washington over the SOPA bill, which is aimed at stopping rogue websites, including and even targeting foreign "rogue" websites "dedicated" to piracy. This sounds good, but a lot of very respectable critics and tech corporations say it threatens the very basis of the internet and the rule of law.
Yahoo has left the US Chamber of Commerce over this issue, and Google and Consumer Electronics Association are thinking about doing so too.
So, it's essentially American internet tech innovators v. the American legacy content industry. This could be one of the biggest copyright policy confrontations ever.
So, it's somewhat unusual that the recently appointed U.S. Register of Copyright, Maria Pallante, would take sides so clearly and so soon on something so controversial. This may signal something of a departure from the traditions of the office she holds, where previous Registers in recent times have exemplified balance and provided expertise to Congress when required.