Access
Copyright as the prevailing party in the recently decided trial judgment in the Federal Court is seeking to recover its legal
costs from York University, as is normal. It is asking for a lump sum of $549,703 which consists of
$321,000 for fees and $228,703 for disbursements and HST. Its material filed on
August 10, 2017 is as follows:
York
University will have a chance to file written submissions in response. It may
be noted that cost recovery in the Federal Court is normally only a portion of
the party’s actual costs. It also may be noted that cost recovery normally
proceeds even while an appeal is pending, unless there is a stay order in place
and this is rare. Apparently, York has made no attempt to stay the costs order
process or any other aspect of Justice Phelan’s judgment.
York’s
costs will not become public unless and until it succeeds on appeal and gets an
order for costs below and files material in support of its costs claim. What we
do know so far is that in December 2015, it was estimated that this litigation
would cost York and
contributing institutions “hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not a million”,
according to York GC Maureen Armstrong in an interview
reported on December 29, 2015. I have no information as to whether that
estimate is still valid.
Access
Copyright is seeking a lump-sum award approximating 50% of the expenses
incurred by it to employ its salaried litigation counsel in this litigation and
100% of its out-of-pocket disbursements. The judgment lists three counsel for
Access Copyright. By comparison, York University has five counsel
listed in the judgment from a large outside law firm.
For those
interested in how this case unfolded, there are some interesting details in Roanie Levy’s affidavit.
HPK
No comments:
Post a Comment