Here’s a letter dated
May 13, 2014 filed by
Access Copyright concerning the apparently very slow process to “bifurcate”
certain issues. As earlier predicted, it
looks like this could indeed go on for a very long time. Here’s the “docket” for this
case.
Also, the parties have now requested and been
granted a trial date. The trial is set to begin on May 16, 2016 and is
scheduled for 15 days, which is a rather long time for a copyright matter.
On a related front, there is no apparent indication
of how the Copyright Board intends to proceed on the Post-Secondary tariff
hearing, which is proceeding effectively by default.
Thus, it looks like there will be a long wait to an
answer about whether there can be a “mandatory tariff”, whether “interim” or
final, that could render a university liable for the entire cost of a tariff if
the university is found to be responsible for a single infringing copy of a
single work in Access Copyright’s repertoire. That cost could clearly be
millions of dollars, in addition to whatever the university has already paid
for various transactional and other licenses.
From what we have seen of the pleadings in the York University case, it is not even clear that this case will resolve the issue, except perhaps in respect of the “interim” tariff under which it is being sued. That could still leave the larger and long term issue of whether a “final” tariff can be mandatory up in the air. There will presumably eventually be a final tariff resulting from the default proceeding underway at the Copyright Board, unless the Board concludes that Access Copyright is not entitled to any tariff as sought.
From what we have seen of the pleadings in the York University case, it is not even clear that this case will resolve the issue, except perhaps in respect of the “interim” tariff under which it is being sued. That could still leave the larger and long term issue of whether a “final” tariff can be mandatory up in the air. There will presumably eventually be a final tariff resulting from the default proceeding underway at the Copyright Board, unless the Board concludes that Access Copyright is not entitled to any tariff as sought.
There may be other ways of getting an earlier
answer to questions about a “mandatory” tariff. However, there is nothing on the record
indicating that this is about to happen.
Finally, here’s a link to
the recent debate between Roanie Levy,
CEO of Access Copyright, and myself that took place at Brock University on May
29, 2014.
HPK
No comments:
Post a Comment