Friday, January 29, 2010

Robertson v. Thomson - Claims Filing Date Extended Until March 30, 2010

I've been advised by a lawyer involved in above matter that, as expected:

"the Court has issued an order (today's date) extending the claims filing deadline by a further sixty days; class members now have until March 30, 2010, 5:00 p.m. to file a claim."
This is good news for the reasons I explained here.

I expect that there will be more details to follow on the class action's counsel's website as well as that of the administrator.


Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Obama v. United States Supreme Court?

Somewhat off topic but not as much as some may think (as to why, more may follow):
With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests –- including foreign corporations –- to spend without limit in our elections. (Applause.) I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. (Applause.) They should be decided by the American people. And I'd urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems.
From President Obama's State of the Union address. January 27, 2010.


Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Robertson v. Thomson - January 18, 2010 Class Action deadline likely to be extended

The deadline of January 18, 2010 for potential claimants in the Robertson v. Thomson class action has now come and gone. Apparently, and not altogether surprisingly, most of the potential claimants missed it.

This case, which went to the Supreme Court of Canada, involved a class action claim for the unauthorized inclusion of articles in certain databases that were written by freelance writers for a host of publications including the Globe and Mail, the National Post and, as recently realized, the Toronto Star, not to mention numerous academic journals.

I understand that only a few hundred people filed timely claims, out of an estimated potential pool of five to ten thousand freelance contributors to the many publications referred to in the law suit, including, as was only realized a few days before the deadline, the Toronto Star and Hamilton Spectator.

Under normal principles, since the settlement had been approved by the Court and notices had been published in accordance with the Court's requirements, the relatively small number of claimants would share settlement proceeds of $11 million less amounts parable to the class action lawyers ($4,000,000), notice and administration costs, 10% of net proceeds of the case to the Law Foundation of Ontario for financial support of the case, etc. A sizable chunk would still be left for the actual writers. The estimated amount available to writers in the settlement fund is about $5.5 million. The maximum payout to any writer is about $55,000.

More here and here and here.

I've been told by a lawyer involved in this process that the class action counsel have asked the Court to extend the deadline for filing a claim, and that this shortly will be announced and is likely be an extension of at least 60 days.

This makes sense and is the responsible thing to do. This apparently takes into account of the very late realization that the Toronto Star freelancers should have included, the timing of the final approval of the settlement and the notice period for filing, much of which took place over the Christmas season, and other factors that may have prevented or discouraged hundreds or thousands of potential claimants to file. The newspaper notices for those that read them were published on October 3, 2009 with an Opt Out deadline of November 2, 2009 and a claim deadline of January 18, 2010. Since a lot of people read their newspapers online today (how ironic), many writers may never have seen these notices.

One of the difficulties for many potential claimants will be the provision of required details of past publications, since freelance writers do not always keep meticulous records and, rather ironically, do not have access because of the high cost to the very databases that are the very subject of the litigation. I understand that many public libraries do have access to these databases, which may help. Moreover, the Class Action claim form itself is not for the faint of heart.

Details of the litigation, the settlement and the claims process, along with a list of the relevant publications can be found here for class counsel (Koskie and Minsky) and the settlement administrator (Cole and Partners).

This is the first concluded major class action in Canada involving copyright. It won't be the last. While there are many ways in which the notification mechanism for the settlement might have been improved, class counsel and the administrator did the right thing by seeking an extension in order that those entitled can put in their claims.

It is important that these class actions get off on the right foot by actually benefiting those who have bee wronged and that such persons are given all reasonable notice, information, material and assistance to facilitate their claims.

So - writers of all kinds take note. There's about $5.5 million dollars out there to be shared by a few thousand writers based on a formula approved by the Court. If you do your homework, that may amount to a few beers or even more. Maybe enough to cure some cases of writer's block.


Monday, January 18, 2010

Hadopi - Strike One

Apparently HADOPI, the "three strikes" anti-infringement creation of French President Sarkozy, whose wife is an entertainer, and the US entertainment industry, has stepped up to the plate with an embarrassing strike one - namely admitted opyright infringement arising out of its launching logo.

Apparently, it was "une erreur de manipulation." French internet users may wish to remember this turn of phrase.

Here's the story in Torrent Freak, with HT to Duncan Bucknell and the IP Kat.