On February 6, 2019 the
Copyright Board issued the following Notice:
File / Dossier: Access Copyright –
Post‐Secondary Educational Institutions (2011‐2013 and 2014‐2017)
Access Copyright –
Établissements d'enseignement postsecondaires (2011‐2013 et
2014‐2017)
February 6, 2019
[CB‐CDA 2019‐007]
NOTICE OF THE BOARD
The Board wishes to consult Parties
on issues of tariff wording before proceeding to certification.
More specifically, the Board seeks
comments on the two attached draft tariffs, for the periods of 2011‐2014 and
2015‐2017. The text of these tariffs is based, respectively, on the 2012 AUCC
Model Licence (Exhibit AC‐2V), and the University Three‐Year Premium Licence
(Exhibit AC‐23N).
Portions of the tariffs in respect of
rates and interest factors have not been included in the attached
versions.
Parties shall comment on the feasibility
and clarity of the terms of the tariff.
Comments shall be filed by no later
than Thursday, February 28, 2019.
The Board has kindly
provided me with a copy of the two “draft tariffs” referred to in the Notice. The
draft 2011-2014 tariff can be seen here.
The draft 2015-2017 tariff can be seen here.
The only two “parties” still
on the record at this point are Access Copyright and one Mr. Sean Maguire, a
self-represented student who has objected to reprographic and private copying tariffs
over the years. All of the parties (most notably AUCC – now Universities Canada
and ACCC - now Colleges and Institutes Canada) that might have brought adequate
resources and expertise to the table to make this an adequately contested
hearing have long since withdrawn for whatever reasons. So, with all due
respect to Mr. Maguire, this is effectively a default proceeding with
potentially complex ramifications flowing from this fact, as I have discussed.
The timing is
interesting. The Board’s Notice suggests that it is ready to issue a decision
soon. It should be noted that this proceeding began on June 12, 2010 – almost
nine years ago – when the proposed tariff was published in the Canada
Gazette.
This notice comes just
about a month ahead of the March 5, 2019 Federal Court of Appeal hearing of the
appeal from the controversial 2017 ruling in Access Copyright v. York University case,
in which the Federal Court found
against York on virtually all aspects of fair dealing and York’s curiously
limited argument that an interim tariff cannot be mandatory. Ariel Katz has brilliantly and frankly looked at “Why did York choose to rely only
on the narrow issue of the Interim Tariff and failed to make any submission on
whether final tariffs would be mandatory?”
The “mandatory tariff” issue could – and indeed should in my view – be the main
issue in this appeal. More about that, an issue, with which I’ve been very involved,
in due course.
HPK
No comments:
Post a Comment