The Supreme Court of Canada this morning granted leave to appeal. Comments to follow.
HK
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Intellectual property law is good. Excess in intellectual property law is not. This blog is about excess in IP and related law. I have practiced law with prestigious firms and successfully acted for interveners in several important Supreme Court cases. I've also been in government & academe. My views are purely personal. Nothing on this blog should be taken as legal advice. I am a policy provocateur and currently not practising law. My email address is hknopf@gmail.com.
Share by Twitter
2013 Clawbies Award Runner Up
Posts
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(109)
-
▼
May
(11)
- Writers' Union of Canada Proposes to Break Ranks w...
- Imagine All the Freedom - UNBC Copyright Conferenc...
- More Questions But No More Answers about the Pendi...
- Attacks on the Memory Tax
- Is Google a "Rogue" Website?
- Access Copyright Claims Trademark (i.e. Monopoly) ...
- No Thanks for the Memory Tax: Stopping It Before I...
- "Taxing" Canadians' Patience & Pocketbooks
- A Report from Fordham on Google Books and the Rule...
- Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal in CMEC v. Ac...
- Leave to Appeal Decision Due Thursday May 5, 2011...
-
▼
May
(11)
Some Useful Links
- 1709 Blog
- Ariel Katz
- Canadian Heritage Copyright Branch
- Centre for Social Media
- CIPPIC
- Copyright Board
- Creative Commons
- Digital Copyright Canada
- EFF
- Fair Copyright for Canada Facebook Site
- Industry Canada IP Policy
- IP Watch
- IPKat
- Larry Lessig
- Laura Murray
- Macera & Jarzyna LLP
- Matthew Ingram
- Michael Geist
- Public Domain
- Recording Industry vs The People
- Sam Trosow
- U of T Law Blog
- Warwick Rothnie
Howard -- You were completely accurate about Judge Chin's decision re the Google Book Settlement --i.e. early in the year and Google would not like it. (Understatement of the year.)
ReplyDeleteThere is growing distrust of Access Copyright by several Canadian writers, who would like full disclosure of its motives and finances. Any predictions about the success of this appeal?
David Bolt