As Michael Geist recently reported, Bill
C-11, which is intended to implement the WIPO Marrakesh Treaty for
the blind, was rushed through the House of Commons with no debate. That does
not mean that the Bill was perfect. Far from it. Indeed, Michael shows
clearly why it needs more work.
It contains a potentially problematic
mechanism to enable the making of regulations that would impose royalties
payable to a collective (any guesses who that might end up being?) and which
could presumably involve oversight and even tariff setting by the Copyright
Board. The latter prospect would no doubt be great for certain lawyers and a
certain collective – and would likely take years to resolve, given the high
cost and slow pace of everything at the Copyright Board. This “commercially
available” exception to the exception mechanism is NOT required by the Treaty
and would make Canada something of an outlier. See below.
Bill C-11 is headed for
second reading the Senate this afternoon. It could, with the best of intentions,
be fast tracked without debate. That could lead to unpleasant results.
This “commercially available” exception to
the exception may be permissible pursuant to the WIPO Treaty but that does not
mean that is necessary or desirable. We need look no further than the
commercially available exception to the ephemeral rights exception in the Copyright
Act to see the dangers of such an approach. It ended up in the Supreme
Court of Canada and the story is far from over.
KEI, the leading and highly respected NGO
that was largely responsible for the success of the WIPO Treaty, has some
pointed comments on the “commercially available” exception and how it is not
required by the treaty – and how
Canada would be an outlier
in invoking such an exception to the exception. Even the USA does not do
this.
Let us hope that the Senate takes the time
to debate – and if necessary – to fix this well-intentioned bill. The last
thing that the blind need is another royalty scheme that will benefit lawyers,
bureaucrats, collectives and result in a call for even more resources at the
Copyright Board. And by the way, how does one spell “T-A-X”?
Here’s the email for The Leader of the Government in the
Senate:
Here’s the email for the Senate Liberal Leader:
jim.cowan@sen.parl.gc.ca
jim.cowan@sen.parl.gc.ca
Here’s the email for the Leader of
the Opposition
in the Senate:
claude.carignan@sen.parl.gc.ca
in the Senate:
claude.carignan@sen.parl.gc.ca
HPK
No comments:
Post a Comment