tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post6295363541433179133..comments2024-03-23T13:09:54.464-04:00Comments on EXCESS COPYRIGHT: UNCITRAL and IP Security InterestsHoward Knopfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18321190334597129416noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-89275512151049351932009-04-08T04:19:00.000-04:002009-04-08T04:19:00.000-04:00I have one comment and one suggestion. The comment...I have one comment and one suggestion. The comment first. We have had comments from the private sector since day 1 of this project, and we will be entertaining such comments until the last day, which is more than a year away. The suggestion now. Have a look at our papers on our web site and send us your comments. It is not too late to submit comments!spiroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05148045028038347277noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-41591140393962531052009-04-07T05:39:00.000-04:002009-04-07T05:39:00.000-04:00Consultation by the Canadian Government is a matte...Consultation by the Canadian Government is a matter for the Canadian Government. However, UNCITRAL documents are on our web site (http://www.uncitral.org). The information includes several papers presented at an International Colloquium on Security Interests in Intellectual Property, organized jointly by WIPO and UNCITRAL, and held in January 2007 with the participation of IP stakeholders from all over the wolrd. The UNCITRAL Secretariat does have a wide distribution list, which includes several stakeholders from Canada. And IPIC was represented at more than one of our meetings, which would lead me to believe that they are informed. Finally, WIPO recently held an information meeting on IP financing(http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=17582).Spirosnoreply@blogger.com