tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post1188819265887119418..comments2024-03-23T13:09:54.464-04:00Comments on EXCESS COPYRIGHT: Distributel Shows & Tells How an Indie ISP can Defend its Customers' Privacy Rights Against Alleged “Copyright Trolling”: Teksavvy Take NoteHoward Knopfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18321190334597129416noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-75283746459204547652013-02-11T14:49:44.830-05:002013-02-11T14:49:44.830-05:00Sorry for the delay, have been very busy today. I...Sorry for the delay, have been very busy today. I am the same D Pucket in DSL Reports and the same Daniel Puckett in the affidavit and written submission. Although it is easy to miss in the docket, NGN and Riding filed for adjournment. As soon as NGN and Riding reschedule the hearing, Distributel will be ready to proceed.<br /><br />From the docket: Adjournment letter dated 08-FEB-2013 received on 08-FEB-2013 from Plaintiff concerning Motion Doc. No. 10 currently scheduled to be heard at General Sitting on 11-FEB-2013 now adjourned sine die placed on file.Daniel Pucketthttp://www.distributel.canoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-4014344576205887202013-02-11T00:08:21.619-05:002013-02-11T00:08:21.619-05:00I dropped your blog post URL to him in the forum p...I dropped your blog post URL to him in the forum post I pasted up above. If/when he see's it maybe he will post here and clarify any questions pertaining to this update and/or identity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-73029736002208352232013-02-10T23:39:01.341-05:002013-02-10T23:39:01.341-05:00Note to Readers:
I cannot confirm that the forego...Note to Readers:<br /><br />I cannot confirm that the foregoing comment is actually from anyone at Distributel. Persons speaking on behalf of Distributel should ideally post in their own name. I’m reluctant to let this go forward but I’m doing so because it is timely and on the assumption that it is indeed bona fide. Anyway, here’s the latest Court “docket” which shows the official state of play, which seems not inconsistent with the comment purporting to speak on behalf of Distributel: http://bit.ly/X1qXPH<br /><br />Assuming that this is from Distributel, I must say that I too am just an “armchair lawyer” - though a real lawyer - so to speak in this matter since nobody has retained me in this case. However, I believe that Distributel has filed very good material and has very competent counsel and I’m surprised it is not pressing forward right now. I don’t know why it would rely on or wait for Teksavvy or CIPPIC at this stage since Distributel seems to be far ahead of both of them in terms of the clarity of its position, its status to assert that position and what is now clearly on the record.<br /><br />Regards,<br /><br />HPK<br />Howard Knopfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18321190334597129416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-81576181089863980152013-02-10T22:56:05.743-05:002013-02-10T22:56:05.743-05:00Hi,
Per Distributel:
Quote:
Unfortunately the pr...Hi,<br /><br />Per Distributel:<br /><br />Quote:<br />Unfortunately the process is rather anti-climactic. NGN and Riding's counsel notified our counsel that they wish an indeterminate adjournment while they wait to see what happens in the CIPPIC Intervenor motion in the Voltage TS motion. We are not in a position to oppose an adjournment as it is their motion.<br /><br />For the armchair lawyers out there.. we could try and oppose but we would have a tough time trying to show how our customer's privacy would be harmed by NGN retreating from the table.<br />/end quote<br /><br />see:<br />https://secure.dslreports.com/forum/r27998161-<br /><br />The court date *was* set for Monday (tomorrow), but that isn't going to be happening now, which in a way is too bad. I would have liked to have seen the outcome of both.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com