tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post117094024495715328..comments2024-03-23T13:09:54.464-04:00Comments on EXCESS COPYRIGHT: The Ecstasy of Influence - A PlagiarismHoward Knopfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18321190334597129416noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-57431393841160972892007-02-15T13:23:00.000-05:002007-02-15T13:23:00.000-05:00I'm 1/2 way through Lethem's essay, and loving it....I'm 1/2 way through Lethem's essay, and loving it. Okay, It flatters my own perspective, but...it does make the points very well.<BR/>and I, too, was looking for a rebuttal from the painter to the photographer in the Garnett/Meiselas piece...and I'd initially thought there was something missing in the article as it seemed one sentence by Garnett ran right into Meiselas's piece...<BR/><BR/>interesting all-around, thoughAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-1171213021028580692007-02-11T11:57:00.000-05:002007-02-11T11:57:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.joyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12876954744357352512noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20803105.post-1170944300220967852007-02-08T09:18:00.000-05:002007-02-08T09:18:00.000-05:00I thought Lethem's article rather tedious and deri...I thought Lethem's article rather tedious and derivative (I know, I know, that was the point, but still...). However, I recommend another article in the same issue, "On the Rights of the Molotov Man," a dialogue between Joy Garnett, a painter, and Susan Meiselas, a photographer whose image Garnett appropriated. Meiselas in particular makes some really interesting comments about the downside of random recirculation that I haven't heard before.Laura J. Murrayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07352031241816296640noreply@blogger.com